Typography / Task 3(A): Type Design & Communication
Typography
Task 3(A) / Type Design & Communication
LECTURES
![]() |
Fig 1.0: Thumbnail, 05.09.2021 |
Link to previous posts (containing all lecture notes and task
submissions):
Task 2: Typography Exploration & Communication
To begin and complete this task, students are required to watch the
tutorial videos from Mr. Vinod's Lecture Playlist. Here's the link.
Typeface Construction (Shapes)
![]() |
Fig 1.1: Anatomy of a Typeface |
![]() |
Fig 1.2: Sketching Typefaces |
![]() |
Fig 1.3: Deconstructed letter |
![]() |
Fig 1.4: Guidelines |
*additional video (optional)
Preview & Type Your Font on Blogger
INSTRUCTIONS
Task 3(A): Type Design & Communication
![]() |
Fig 2.0: Task Requirements, 15.10.2021 |
Research
When Mr Vinod gave us this assignment, I already had two ideas in my mind, Retro Serif and Modern Serif. Since I really like serifs, especially those two, so I explored for references in internet. Actually, both of them look similar to people, but I feel like Retro Serif somehow has the cute/funny vibes, while Modern Serif looks more stiff and clena, and has a minimalist feel, that's why I love both.
Fig 2.1.1: Retro Serif |
![]() |
Fig 2.1.2: Modern Serif |
Exploration
![]() |
Fig 2.2.1: Rough Sketch, 08.10.2021 |
The next time, I managed to draw 3 more sketches of typeface, but this time I did it digitally. And also this time I designed for all the characters provided by Mr Vinod (I missed out the letter g on the first sketch).
![]() |
Fig 2.2.2: Sketch #1, 16.10.2021 |
Actually, I was really out of idea when doing this, except for the first sketch which is my original intention since the beginning. So I ended up looking around to find inspiration like Mr Vinod said. Surprisingly, I got inspired by some brand logos.
![]() |
Fig 2.2.3: Pristine logo |
![]() |
Fig 2.2.4: Logitech logo |
![]() |
Fig 2.2.5: Arista Typeface |
I got inspired from those typefaces but I tried to make it with my own taste because I don't like seeing it too ordinary.
![]() |
Fig 2.2.6: Sketch #2, 16.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.2.7: HARIBO logo |
Fig 2.2.8: Bold Rounded Typefaces |
I tried to sketch with my own style and later found that it looks not so rounded anymore and has a bit of futuristic vibe.
![]() |
Fig 2.2.9: Sketch #3, 16.10.2021 |
Digitization
Finally I decided to use the second sketch as my next work because after I
took a look again at those 5, I felt like this one is the best choice. The
first manual sketch looks too stiff and somehow feels weird. The second one
seems too common, can be found anywhere. Actually the first digital sketch,
the serif one looks good but I just felt like it would be hard for me to
digitalize later. For the last one, I don't think it is the best choice if
we look at all the sketches, so I just believed it's not this one.
I began puting the guide lines and then started moving the sketch immediately.
![]() |
Fig 2.3.1: Guides, 20.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.3.2: Making letter a, 20.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.3.3: Typeface thickness, 20.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.3.4: Making letter y, 20.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.3.5: Outlines from letter y, 20.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.3.6: Giving serif to letter g, 20.10.2021 |
From this attempt, I have two designs. One with serif, and the other one without it.
![]() |
Fig 2.3.7: 1st outcome, 20.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.3.8: 2nd outcome, 20.10.2021 |
After getting feedback from Mr Vinod, I tried to modify some letters (a, p,
d, b) a bit. I also increased the size of the dots (for letter i, exclaim
mark, comma, and period). The thickness increased from 80 points to 120
points so it'll be easier to see.
![]() |
Fig 2.3.9: Outcome after feedback, 22.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.3.10: Outlines, 22.10.2021 |
Ascender: 730 pt
Capital height: 696 pt
Median: 500 pt
Baseline: 0 pt
Descender: -230 pt
![]() |
Fig 2.3.11: Measurements, 22.10.2021 |
FontLab Progression
After finish doing it, I moved my work from Illustrator to FontLab7 by following the same steps as Mr. Vinod. The process was easier than I thought. We only need to copy from Illustrator and paste the letter into FontLab7. But before that, the file should be customized first, and I again followed Mr. Vinod video.
![]() |
Fig 2.4.1: Adjusting the size, 27.10.2021 |
I named my typeface "Plutee" with no reason. I just feel like the name fits the font well so I named them Plutee.
![]() |
Fig 2.4.2: Naming the typeface, 27.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.4.3: Importing letters, 27.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.4.4: All characters arrived safely, 27.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.4.5: Characters before kerning, 27.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.4.6: Characters after kerning, 27.10.2021 |
Font Generation & Posters
The very last thing to do is applying our typeface to poster. We were given some examples of the application from Mr. Vinod and were free to explore it ourselves.
![]() |
Fig 2.5.1: Poster examples |
![]() |
Fig 2.5.2: Poster #1, 28.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.5.3: Poster #2, 28.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.5.4: Poster #3, 28.10.2021 |
![]() |
Fig 2.5.5: Poster #4, 28.10.2021 |
For the final submission, I picked the second poster. However, I just realized that I used the wrong size for the artboard, I chose Poster size instead of A4, so I resized them. I also modified the size of some words since Mr. Vinod told us to use the same point size for all the words.
Final Outcome
- Letterforms
![]() |
Fig 2.6.1: Final Outcome in .jpg, 22.10.2021 |
Final Outcome in .pdf
- Poster
![]() |
|
|
Final Outcome in .pdf
Total hours spent on this task: 12 hours
Generated Typeface Download
Download Plutee by clicking here.
Let's try out Plutee!
FEEDBACK
WEEK 8
Independent Learning Week
WEEK 9
- It's a very cute typeface and got a lot of smiles
- The 'corner' part in letter a, b, d, p is a bit complicated, it is too close to each other
- Maintain the same gaps for all parts
- The dots in exclaim mark, comma, and period, and letter i need to be bigger
WEEK 10
- Don't use other than A4 size for the poster
- The poster is awesome!
REFLECTIONS
FURTHER READING
![]() |
Fig 3.1: Typographic Design: Form and Communication |
Stroke-to-height ratio
The roman letterform, above, has the stroke-width-tocapital-height
proportion found on Roman inscriptions. Superimposition on a grid
demonstrates that the height of the letter is ten times the stroke width.
In the adjacent rectangles, the center letter is reduced to one-half the
normal stroke width, and the letter on the right has its stroke width
expanded to twice the normal width. In both cases, pronounced change in
the weight and appearance of the letterform occurs.
![]() |
Fig 3.2: Stroke-to-height-ratio |
Contrast in stroke weight
A change in the contrast between thick and thin strokes can alter
the optical qualities of letterforms. In the Old Style typography of the
Renaissance, designers attempted to capture some of the visual properties
of pen writing. Since the writing pens of the period had a flat edge, they
created thick and thin strokes. Stress is the term used to define this
thickening of the strokes, which is particularly pronounced on curves.
Note how the placement of weight within the Old Style O creates a diagonal
axis. As time has passed, type designers have been less influenced by
writing. By the late 1700s, the impact of writing declined, and this axis
became completely vertical in many typefaces of that period. In many of
the earliest sans serif typefaces, stress disappeared completely. Some of
these typefaces have a monoline stroke that is completely even in weight.
![]() |
Fig 3.3: Contrast in stroke weight |
Expanded and condensed styles
The design qualities of a typographic font change dramatically when the widths of the letterforms are expanded or condensed. The word proportion, set in two sans serif typefaces, demonstrates extreme expansion and condensation. In the example, the top one, set in Aurora Condensed, the stroke-to-height ratio is 1 to 9. While the bottom one, set in Information, the stroke-toheight ratio is 1 to 2. Although both words are exactly the same height, the condensed typeface takes up far less area on the page.
x-height and proportion
The proportional relationship between the x-height and capital, ascender, and descender heights influences the optical qualities of typography in a signifcant way. The same characters are set in 72-point type using three typefaces with widely varying x-heights.