Typography / Task 2: Typography Exploration & Communication

24.09.2021 - 08.10.2021 (Week 5 - Week 7)
Lulu Luisa Linardi / 0349358 / Bachelor of Design (Hons) in Creative Media
Typography
Task 2 / Typography Exploration & Communication


LECTURES

Fig 1.0: Thumbnail, 05.09.2021


Link to: 

Task 1: Exercise 1 & 2

Task 2: Typography Exploration & Communication

Task 3(A): Type Design & Communication

Task 3(B): Type Design & Communication


Week 5: Understanding

a. Understanding Letterforms
- The uppercase letterforms below suggest symmetry, but in fact it is not symmetrical
- It's easy to see the two different stroke weights of the Baskerville stroke form (below); more noteworthy is the fact that each bracket connecting the serif to the stem has a unique arc

Fig 1.1.1: Baskerville

- The uppercase letterforms may appear symmetrical, but a close examination shows that the width of the left slope is thinner than the right stroke
- Both Baskerville (previous) and Univers (below) demonstrate the meticulous care a type designer takes 
to create letterforms that are both internally harmonious and individually expressive

Fig 1.1.2: Univers

- The complexity of each individual letterform is neatly demonstrated by examining the lowercase 'a' of two seemingly similar sans-serif typefaces–Helvetica and Univers
- A comparison of how the stems of the letterforms finish and how the bowls meet the stems quickly reveals the palpable difference in character between the two

Fig 1.1.3: Helvetica (Left); Univers (Right)


b. Maintaining x-height
- The x-height generally describe the size of the lowercase letterforms
- Keep in mind that curved strokes, such as in 's', must rise above the median (or sink below the baseline) in order to appear to be the same size as the vertical and horizontal strokes they adjoin.

Fig 1.1.4: X-height


c. Form / Counterform
- Is the space describes, and often contained, by the strokes of the form
- Includes the spaces between letters, when they're joined to form words

Fig 1.1.5: Counterforms #1

Fig 1.1.6: Counterforms #2


d. Contrast
- The simple contrasts produces numerous variations: small+organic / large+machined; small+dark / large+light

Fig 1.1.7: Contrast


Week 6: Screen & Print (Typography in Different Medium)

a. Print Type vs Screen Type

Type for Print
- Primarily, type was designed intended for reading from print long before we read from screen
- A good typeface for print-Caslon, Garamond, Baskerville are the most common typefaces that is used for print, because of their characteristic which are elegant and intellectual but also highly readable when set at small font size
- They are versatile, easy-to-digest classic typeface, which has a neutrality and versatility that makes typesetting with it a breeze

Fig 1.2.1: Example of Type for Print


Type for Screen
- Typefaces intended for use on the web are optimized and often modified to enhance readability and performance onscreen in a variety of digital environments
- Can include a taller x-height (or reduced ascenders and descenders), wider letterforms, more open counters, heavier thin strokes and serifs, reduced stroke contrast, as well as modified curves and angles for some designs
- Another important adjustment – especially for typefaces intended for smaller sizes – is more open spacing. 

Hyperactive Link (Hyperlink)
A word, phrase, or image that you can click on to jump to a new document or a new section within the current document.
- Found in nearly all Web pages, allowing users to click their way from page to another.
- Text hyperlinks are normally blue and underlined by default. 

Font Size for Screen
- 16-pixel text on a screen is about the same size as text printed in a book or magazine; this is accounting for reading distance
- If you were to read them at arm’s length, you’d want at least 12 points, which is about the same size as 16 pixels on most screens

System Fonts for Screen (Web Safe Fonts)
- Each device comes with its own pre-installed font selection, which is based largely on its operating system
- Some type family which can be considered as 'Web Safe Fonts' are Open Sans, Lato, Arial, Helvetica, Times New Roman, Times, Courier New, Courier, Verdana, Georgia, Palatino, Garamond

Fig 1.2.2: Font Size for Screen (Left); Print (Right)


Pixel Differential Between Devices
- The screens used by our PCs, tablets, phones and TVs are not only different sizes, but the text we see on-screen differs in proportion too, because they have different sized pixels. 100 pixels on a laptop is very different from 100 pixels on a big 60″ HDTV
- Even within a single device class there will be a lot of variation

Fig 1.2.3: Pixel Differential


b. Static vs Motion
- Static typography has minimal characteristic in expressing words
- Traditional characteristics such as bold and italic offer only a fraction of the expressive potential of dynamic properties

Fig 1.2.4: Static Typography

Motion Typography
Temporal media offer typographers opportunities to “dramatize” type, for letterforms to become “fluid” and “kinetic” (Woolman and Bellantoni, 1999)
- Motion graphics, particularly the brand identities of film and television production companies, increasingly contain animated type
- Type is often overlaid onto music videos and advertisements, often set in motion following the rhythm of a soundtrack
- On-screen typography has developed to become expressive, helping to establish the tone of associated content or express a set of brand values, which must prepare the audience for the film by evoking a certain mood.



INSTRUCTIONS


Task 2: 
Typography Exploration & Communication

For this task, we were told to create a layout of editorial text. There are three different text options provided in Facebook group, and we are given the chance to choose it by ourselves. So I chose the second option, which heading is "Be Good, Do Good, Follow the Code." Again, we are only allowed to use the 10 typefaces given by Mr. Vinod to complete this task. There's also another requirements for the task as well. 
Requirements for Task 2:
- Font size (8–12)
- Line Length (55–65/50–60 characters)
- Text Leading (2, 2.5, 3 points larger than font size)
- Ragging (left alignment) / Rivers (Left Justification)
- Cross Alignment
- No Widows / Orphans

Fig 2.1.1: Preview of Chosen Editorial Text

So before I start doing it, I did a layout research first to gain more ideas for the layout. I explored for the headline and body text layout in Pinterest and got these as my references.

Fig 2.1.2: Layout Reference #1

Fig 2.1.3: Layout Reference #2

Fig 2.1.4: Layout Reference #3

After having those references, I went to Procreate to draw the thumbnail sketch for my editorial layout. I came out with 3 different ideas. I made the plan for my actual layout later and also replaced the body text with patches for now.

Fig 2.1.5: Rough Sketch, 29.09.2021

Next, I created the actual design of my headings using Adobe Illustrator. I made the same design of the heading layout as my rough sketch, except for the second sketch. For the second layout, I tried to explore more on it and finally got a new idea as seen on Fig 2.2.4. I also did the kerning for some letters and fixed the leading to make it looks better and nicer.

- Heading #1

Fig 2.2.1: Heading #1 making process, 01.10.2021

Fig 2.2.2: Heading #1, 01.10.2021


- Heading #2

Fig 2.2.3: Heading #2 making process, 01.10.2021

Fig 2.2.4: Heading #2, 01.10.2021


- Heading #3

Fig 2.2.5: Heading #3 making process, 01.10.2021

Fig 2.2.6: Heading #3, 01.10.2021


I made my headlines for both sketches in Illustrator, and moved them to InDesign immediately. Actually I encountered a problem when moving the headline, even though I had followed the same steps as Mr. Vinod. I tried to fix that problem for many times and finally I could overcome it. So, here's my attempt for the layout, and its digital progression.

Fig 2.3.0: Idea Exploration for Layout, 02.10.2021


- Layout #1

This is my first attempt for this editorial text layout. I provided the original outcome and the one that is covered with patches. I also put the proof of cross alignment (achieved).

Fig 2.3.1: Covered Layout #1, 02.10.2021

Fig 2.3.2: Cross Alignment achieved #1, 02.10.2021

- Fonts: Bodoni STD (Poster, Poster Italic, Roman, Italic) [Heading]; Bembo STD (Regular, Semibold Italic) [Body Text]
- Point Size: 12 pt
- Text Leading: 14.5 pt
- Line Length: 50-56 (left page); 29-37 (right page)
- Alignment: Justified

Fig 2.3.3: First layout attempt, 02.10.2021


- Layout #2

Here is my second layout for this editorial text. I provided the original outcome and the one that is covered with patches. I also put the proof of cross alignment (achieved).

Fig 2.3.4: Covered Layout #2, 02.10.2021

Fig 2.3.5: Cross Alignment achieved #2, 02.10.2021

- Fonts: Serifa Std (46 Light Italic, 65 Bold, 75 Black) [Heading]; Futura Std (Book, Heavy Oblique) [Body Text]
- Point Size: 11 pt
- Text Leading: 14 pt
- Line Length: 28-36
- Alignment: Justified

Fig 2.3.6: Second layout attempt, 02.10.2021


- Layout #3
This is the third layout I made for the editorial text. I provided the original outcome and the one that is covered with patches. I also put the proof of cross alignment (achieved).

Fig 2.3.7: Covered Layout #3, 02.10.2021

Fig 2.3.8: Cross Alignment achieved #3, 02.10.2021

- Fonts: Gill Sans Std (Ultra Bold), Univers LT Std (93 Extra Black Extended) [Heading]; Gill Sans Std (Light, Regular, Bold Italic) [Body Text]
- Point Size: 10.5 pt
- Text Leading: 13 pt
- Line Length: 36-42 (left page and 1st & 2nd column in right page); 38-49 (3rd column in right page)
- Alignment: Justified, Left-justify (the 5th paragraph from bottom)

Fig 2.3.9: Third layout attempt, 02.10.2021


Actually I was very confused when choosing which layout should I use. But then, I decided to choose the first layout as the final outcome because I think it is really neat and the alignment is well-executed, if I compare it to the other layouts.

However, after getting feedback from Mr. Vinod, saying that I shouldn't have the different column width, and my column interval (column gutter) between two text columns is too close, I made a bit change on it. I decided to break the two columns in the left page into three columns, so it is now having the same width. I also modified the gutter, made it bigger from 4.233 mm to 5.5 mm.

Fig 2.4.1: Modifying the Columns, 08.10.2021

Fig 2.4.2: Repairing some details #1, 08.10.2021

Fig 2.4.3: Repairing some details #2, 08.10.2021

Here's the updated details.
- Fonts: Bodoni STD (Poster, Poster Italic, Roman, Italic) [Heading]; Bembo STD (Regular, Semibold Italic) [Body Text]
- Point Size: 12 pt
- Text Leading: 14.5 pt
- Line Length: 28-38
- Alignment: Justified, Left-justify (the last paragraph & 5th paragraph from bottom)
- Margin: 10 mm
- Gutter: 5.5 mm

Fig 2.4.4: Covered Layout (Revised ver.), 08.10.2021

Fig 2.4.5: Cross Alignment achieved (Revised ver.), 08.10.2021


Final Outcome

Fig 2.4.6: Final Outcome in .jpg, 08.10.2021

Final Outcome in .pdf

Total hours spent on this task: 10 hours


FEEDBACK

WEEK 6

General Feedback: 
- Pay attention to ragging, widows, and orphans, make sure there's no widows or orphans

Specific Feedback:
- The first sketch is interesting, your plan is clearly has a flow
- 2nd and 3rd sketch also seems okay
- Need to done the actual layout first to see whether the layout is exciting or not

WEEK 7

General Feedback: 

Specific Feedback:
(E-Portfolio)
Good progress, keep it up!

(Task 2)
- Layout is adequate but, the coloumn width of the body texts differ (it should not)
- The coloumn interval (space between two text coloumns when justified must be bigger-right now its too close)


REFLECTIONS

Experience
I'm quite new to Adobe InDesign and I don't think I've mastered the software already. So right now I'm challenging myself to operate this new software better while doing the typography task. But despite of that, I'm having a fun because I'm doing the task and exploring InDesign tools, etc. at the same time. 

Observations
Realized that student needs to have exploration and references as much as possible, so they can  get intresting idea and produce a design that has its own unique and attractive side.

Findings
I just realized recently that actually I don't need to compare my works with the others because it will only bring dissatisfaction and make ourselves become more insecure with our own work. As long as we can follow the lecture well and keep pace with the class, that's already okay.


FURTHER READING

Fig 3.1: Typographic Design: Form and Communication

Reference:
Carter, R., Day, B., Meggs, P. B., Maxa, S., & Sanders, M.
(2015). Typographic design: Form and Communication
Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[Chapter 2: The Anatomy of Typography]
The Type Family
A type family consists of a group of related typefaces, unifed by a set of similar design characteristics. Each face in the family is individual, and each has been created by changing visual aspects of the parent font.

Fig 3.2: Example of Type Family

Weight changes
- By simply changing the stroke width relative to the height of the letters, a whole series of alphabets, ranging from extremely light to very bold, can be produced

Proportion
- Changing the proportions of a typestyle by making letterforms wider (expanded) or narrower (condensed), as discussed earlier, is another method for adding typefaces to a type family

Angle
- In the discussion about the basic classifcation of typefaces, italics were presented as a major independent category

Elaboration
- An added complexity, fullness of detail, or ornamentation